Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Penggelapan Berkedok Investasi Online (Bitcoin)

(Studi Kasus Putusan PN Kupang Nomor 129/Pid.B/2021/PN. Kpg Jo Putusan PT Kupang Nomor 143/Pid/2021/PT Kpg Jo Putusan MA Nomor 422 K/Pid/2022)

Authors

  • Maria Graciana Erlan Jaja Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Debi F. Ng. Fallo Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Orpa G. Manuain Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i2.2891

Keywords:

Fraud, Embezzlement, Online Investment (BITCOIN)

Abstract

Fraud through the internet or online-based fraud is a crime that is rife today. The increasing use of the internet turns out to open up greater opportunities for fraudsters to get money or profit from the internet. Transact in online investment activities using exchange in the form of electronic money (bitcoin). With this virtual money, now business transactions can be carried out without involving intermediaries such as banks. The main problem in this study is what is the form of fraud and embezzlement in online investment (BITCOIN) based on Kupang District Court Decision Number 129/Pid.B/2021/PN. Kpg Jo Kupang High Court Decision Number 143/Pid/2021/PT Kpg Jo Supreme Court Decision Number 422 K/Pid/2022 and whether the court decision against fraud and embezzlement under the guise of online investment (BITCOIN) is fair to the victim. This research is a normative legal research that examines based on existing decisions, laws and regulations, legal theories and opinions of scholars. The results of this study show that (1) there are two forms of criminal acts that researchers found in the verdict, namely fraud and embezzlement. (2) the aspect of justice contained in the decision that it is not fair to the victim based on the laws and regulations and criminal sanctions given to the accused. Therefore, suggestions for the results of this study are (1) It is recommended that local governments that have duties and responsibilities in solving these problems can pay attention to the application of criminal sanctions.

References

Alfa, N., & Others. (2019). Risiko Pencucian Uang Dalam Bitcoin.

Alif, K. (2020). Dasar Investasi Dan Trending Cryptocurrency. Jakarta: Ak Pedia.

Ananda, S. (2009). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Kartika.

Bagaskoro. (2019). Pengantar Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Data. Yogyakarta: Cv Budi Utama.

Berutu, A. G. (2019). Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang Dalam Pandangan Kuhp Dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Journal Of Sharia Economic Law , 2.

Dirjosisworo. (1984). Ruang Lingkup Krimonologi. Jakarta: 21.

Firdausi, N., & Ferina, N. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Investasi. Malang: Ub Proses.

Indonesia, I. (2018). Bagaimana Bitcoin Bisa Digunakan Untuk Pencucian Uang

Kitab Undang -Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Lamintang, P. (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Pt Citra Aditya Bakti.

Moestadjab, W. (2018). Trik Menghindari Penipuan. Surabaya: Gramansa.

Nasution, M. S. (2017). Hukum Dalam Pendekata Filsafat. Jakarta: Kencana.

Natih, Dewi, & Dinar. (2022). Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Dengan Modus Investasi Online.

Nuzula, N. F., & Nurlaily, F. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Investasi. Malang: Ub Press.

Partiana, F. (2023). Penipuan Dan Penggelapan. Firma Hukum Konspirasi Keadilan.

Peraturan Bappebti No 5 Tahun 2009

Prodjodikoro, W. (2003). Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia. Bandung: Reflika Adityama.

Rahardjo, A. (2002). Cybercrime Dan Upayah Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi . Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rifai, A. (2020). Kesalahan Hakim Dalam Penerapan Hukum . Makassar: Cv Nas Media.

Salam, A., Zuwandana, A., Indraswary, A. D., Al-Azmi, C., Syapiq, M., & Dewi, Y. (2022). Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Uu Ite . Kisaran: Guepedia.

Sam, Y. A., Hutapea, M. R., & Setiawan , S. (2022). Legalitas Cryptocurrency Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 109

Santoso, M. A. (2014). Hukum Moral Dan Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sari, A. R., Hamid, A., Utami, R. A., Amalia, M., Sipayung, B., Mahrida, . . . Musofiana, I. (2022). Tindak Pidana Dalam Kuhp. Sumatra Barat: Pt Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Suhriyanto, B. (2012). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi . Jakarta: Raja Graffindo Persada.

Taufik , M. (2013). Filsafat John Rawls Tentang Teori Keadilan. Jurnal Studi Islam , 43.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

Yanto, O. (2021). Pemidanaan Atas Kejahatan Yang Berhubungan Dengan Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru.

Zaenal, A., & Aukia, S. N. (2018). Sosioteknologi. Sosioteknologi, 1.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Maria Graciana Erlan Jaja, Debi F. Ng. Fallo, & Orpa G. Manuain. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Penggelapan Berkedok Investasi Online (Bitcoin) : (Studi Kasus Putusan PN Kupang Nomor 129/Pid.B/2021/PN. Kpg Jo Putusan PT Kupang Nomor 143/Pid/2021/PT Kpg Jo Putusan MA Nomor 422 K/Pid/2022). Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 2(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i2.2891

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.