Criminal Responsibilities Or Political Partners As Corporations In Corruption Criminal Action And Money Laundering Criminal Acts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i3.1059Keywords:
political parties, corporations, criminal acts of corruption, money laundering crimesAbstract
The existence of political parties plays a strategic role in the development of democracy and the nation is faced with a number of issues that create a negative impression on these organs, some of which include; first, the problem of involvement of political parties in various cases of corruption and money laundering crimes that have an impact on the fall of public image and trust in the organization; second, the problem of pro and contra accountability of political parties involved in cases of corruption and criminal acts of money laundering before the law; and third, the issue of imposing criminal sanctions on political parties as the subject of corporate offenses known in corruption and money laundering. This research belongs to the typology of juridical normative legal research with secondary data types in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach taken includes the comparison, conceptual, statutory, and philosophical approaches, and analyzed descriptively qualitatively through literature. The results of the study show that; first, the justification of political parties as corporations in criminal acts of corruption and criminal acts of money laundering can be seen in five basic perspectives, namely philosophical foundation, juridical basis, historical basis, sociological basis, and political foundation of criminal law; second, the ideal concept of political party punishment as a corporation is carried out with a reconceptualization of the subject of corporate delictions in the affirmation of two types of corporations, namely corporations in the form of private and special corporations or in the form of public with different provisions on punishment arrangements. The need for an amendment to some provisions of the Corruption Law and the TPPU Law related to corporations in accommodating the two types of corporations into a forum for the implementation of ideas, of course issuing a law that contains specific provisions regarding special corporate punishment can be the answer to a myriad of issues regarding criminalization
References
Ahmad Suhelmi, Pemikiran Politik Barat, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2000.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Simposium Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Bina Cipta, Bandung, 1986.
Beth Stephens, The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, Berkeley Journal of International Law, California, 2002.
E.B Diskant, “Comparative Corporate Criminal Liability American Doctrine Through Comparative Criminal Procedure”, The Yale Journal, 118:126, 2008.
Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Perkembangan dan Penerapan, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2015.
Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of The Criminal Sanction, Stanford University Press, California, 1968.
Jimly Asshidiqie, Pengantar Ilmu hukum Tata Negara Jilid 2, Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2006.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Cetakan Ketiga, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1988.
R. Wiyono, Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tidak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2009.
Pamela H. Bucy, “Trends in Corporate Criminal Prosecutions”, American Law Review, California, 2007.
Thomas Meyer, Peran Partai Politik dalam Sebuah Sistem Demokrasi: Sembilan Tesis, Cetakan Ketiga, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), Jakarta, 2012.
Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Ketiga, UI Press, Jakarta, 2015
Sudarto, Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat: Kajian terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, Sinar Baru, Bandung, 1983.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Grafiti Pers, Jakarta, 2006.
Pamela H. Bucy, “Trends in Corporate Criminal Prosecutions”, American Law Review, California, 2007.
Hasanuddin, M. Y. Tiyas Tinov, dan Ishak, “Partai dan Pendidikan Politik (Analisis Peran Partai Politik di Desa Buluh Cina Kecamatan Siak Hulu Kabupaten Kampar)”, Makalah, 2013.
Mziwonke Samson Dunywa, A Critical Evaluation of Section 332 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, Thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa, 2008.
Anonim, “Dana Parpol Hasil Korupsi Harus Terkuak”, dalam http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2011/08/17/17210454/dana.parpol.hasil. korupsi.harus.terkuak, diakses pada hari Minggu anggal 19 Mei 2019 pukul 20:00 WIB
Anonim, “Anas Urbaningrum Divonis 8 Tahun Penjara”, dalam www.bbc.com/indonesia /berita_ indonesia/2014/09/140924_vonis_anas_urbaningrum, diakses pada hari Minggu tanggal 19 Mei 2019 pukul 20:22 WIB
Priska Sari Pratiwi, “Angelina Sondakh: Demokrat Terima 20 Persen dari Tiap Proyek”, dalam https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170830145604-12-238374/angelina-sondakhdemokrat- terima-20-persen-dari-tiap-proyek/, dakses pada hari Rabu tanggal 19 Mei 2019 pukul 22:00 WIB
Adnan Topan Husodo, “Mengukur Partai Terkorup, dalam https://antikorupsi.org/news/mengukur-partai-terkorup, diakses pada hari Senin tanggal 20 Mei 2019 pukul 04:30 WIB
Anonim, “Pukat: Seluruh Parpol Terlibat Kasus Korupsi”, dalam http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5329627e98607/pukat--seluruh-parpol-terlibat-kasuskorupsi, diakses pada hari Senin tanggal 20 Mei 2019 pukul 04:55 WIB
Tama S. Langkun, “Partai Politik dalam Pusaran Korupsi E-KTP”, dalam https://www.gatra.com/kolom-dan-wawancara/252729-partai-politik-dalam-pusaran-korupsi-e-ktp, diakses pada hari Senin tanggal 20 Mei 2019 pukul 10:WIB
Anonim, “KPK Didesak untuk Jerat Korporasi dan Partai Politik”, dalam http://internasional.kompas.com/read/2013/03/07/02232546/kpk.didesak.untuk.jerat.korporasi.dan. partai.politik, diakses pada hari Kamis tanggal 26 Oktober 2017 pukul 13:00 WIB
Hanafi, “Reformasi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum, Volume 6 Nomor 11, 1999.
Sania Mashabi, “MA Sebut PERMA Belum Cukup Jerat Pelaku Kejahatan Korporasi”, dalam https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/ma-sebut-perma-belum-cukup-jerat-pelaku kejahatan korporasi. html, diakses pada hari Senin tanggal 20 Mei 2019 pukul 17:00 WIB
KPK sebut kader partai tertangkap korupsi tanggung jawab pribadi, https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/kpk-sebut-kader-partai-tertangkap-korupsi-tanggung-jawab-pribadi.html, diakses 22 Juni 2019
(Dian) Brouwer, “Corporate Liability for Regulatory & Criminal Sanctions under Dutch Law”, CMS Derks Star Busmann, June 2014
United States Sentencing Commission, Guidline Manual, November 1, 2016, paragraph 8A1.1
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Partai Politik
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
