Peer To Peer Lending : Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak Dan  Perlindungan Hukum Apabila Gagal Bayar

Hugo Fernando Felix; Dewa Gede Pradnyana Yustiawan

doi:10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1201

Authors

Hugo Fernando Felix Universitas Udayana
Dewa Gede Pradnyana Yustiawan Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1201

Keywords:

Default, Legal Relationship, Fintech P2P Lending

Abstract

The aim of this publication is to clarify the legal relationship between parties involved in peer-to-peer lending as well as legal protection in the event of default. This research uses a method known as normative legal research or library law research, where secondary data or library materials are used as source material. In addition, this page explains in general the P2P lending model, rules, P2P lending arrangements in Indonesia, and consumer legal protection. Based on this research, it is known that the parties involved in P2P lending have power relations, loan agreements, and cooperation agreements. Depending on the cause of default, the lender or P2P Lending provider may be liable for default risk. Although illegal P2P lending is not subject to OJK regulations, legal P2P lending businesses are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and must comply with OJK regulations. Subjective terms are violated by loan agreements signed through illegal P2P Lending, allowing requests for cancellation in court.

References

Alloway, Tracy. “Big Banks Muscle In on Peer-to-Peer Lending.” Financial Times, 2013.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan HAM RI. Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan HAM RI, 2008.

Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Finansial, Pub. L. No. NOMOR 19/12/PBI/2017 (2017).

Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 2/24/PBI.2000 tentang Hubungan Rekening Giro antara Bank Indonesia dengan Pihak Ekstern, Pub. L. No. PBI Nomor 3/11/PBI/2011 (2011).

Dhar, Vasant, and Roger M. Stein. “Economic and Business Dimensions: Fintech Platforms and Strategy.” Communications of the ACM, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132726.

Dewanthara, Ni Made Intan Pranita, and Made Gde Subha Karma Resen. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Pemberi Pinjaman Akibat Terjadinya Gagal Bayar Pada Peer to Peer Lending.” Acta Comitas 5, no. 3 (December 2020): 479. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i03.p04.

Gazali, Djoni S. dan Rachmadi Usman, Hukum Perbankan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.

Harahap, M. Yahya, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Bandung, 1986.

Karisma, Dona Budi. “Problematika Mekanisme Penyelesaian Pinjaman Gagal Bayar Pada Pinjaman Online Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 1, no. 1 (2020).

Novenanty, Wurianalya Maria. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Lender Dan Borrower Dalam Peer To Peer Lending Di Indonesia.” In APHK IV, 2018

R. Subekti, Aneka Perjanjian, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1995.

Rahmahafida, Nadia Intan. “Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Pemberi Pinjaman Pada Layanan Pinjaman Pendidikan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Risiko Gagal Bayar.” Jurist-Diction 3, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i2.18203.

“Mandiri Virtual Account” http://www.bankmandiri.co.id/article/commercialvirtual-account.asp diakses pada tanggal 3 Agustus 2017

“Praktik Bank Gelap” m.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt5003cbf860b91/ praktik-bank-gelap diakses pada tanggal 10 Juli 2017

https://uangteman.com/work, diakses pada tanggal 26 Mei 2017

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 324)