Keabsahan Kontrak Secara Elektronik Sebagai Alat Pembuktian  Di Tinjau secara Hukum Perdata

Ni Luh Putu Sudarini; dewa gede pradnyana yustiawan

doi:10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1136

Authors

Ni Luh Putu Sudarini Universitas Udayana
dewa gede pradnyana yustiawan Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1136

Keywords:

legality, electronic contracts, evidence

Abstract

Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 states a lawsuit if civil procedural law applies to evidence. This is because there are differences in the law of proof with civil and criminal procedural law and considering the validity of evidence as a matter of procedural law also affects the legality of making documents, especially with electronic documents. Based on this description, the researcher makes several notes, especially regarding the certainty of an electronic contract law in Indonesia and the legality of e-contracts as evidence from a civil law point of view. The research results form the basis of legal certainty for electronic contracts in Indonesia based on article 5 of Law No. November 2008 concerning information and electronic transactions stipulated by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016, still based on the legality of electronic contracts used as evidence from a civil law perspective sourced from the decision of the Constitutional Court 20/PUU-XIV/2016 and provisions related to contracts in general are contained in the Civil Code.

References

Ding, Julian. (1999). E-commerce: Law & practice. Sweet & Maxwell Asia. Google Scholar

Elektronik, Secara, & Ite, Perspektif U. U. (N.D.). Keabsahan Kontrak Perdagangan Secara Elektronik: Perspektif Uu Ite. Google Scholar

Hanafiah, Ali. (2000). Perbandingan kinerja keuangan perusahaan logam sebelum dan sesudah menjadi perusahaan publik di Indonesia:: Studi di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Google Scholar

Hasanah, Uswatun, & Waliamin, Janusi. (n.d.). Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik Berbasis Online Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba. Google Scholar

Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik, & No, Jl Medan Merdeka Utara. (n.d.). Penggunaan Informasi Elektronik Dan Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Persidangan The Usage Of Electronic Information And Document As Court Evidence. Google Scholar

Irawan, Sofyan Adi. (2020). Eksistensi Dokumen Elektronik Di Persidangan Perdata. Artikel Diterbitkan,(Online), Diakes Melalui (Https://Www. Mahkamahagung. Go. Id/Id/Artikel/3048/Eksistensi-Dokumen-Elektronik-Di-Persidangan-Perdata), Diakses Pada Tanggal, 14. Google Scholar

Kantaatmadja, Mieke Komar. (2002). Pengaturan Kontrak untuk Perdagangan Elektronik (e-Contract). Cyberlaw: Suatu Pengatar, Cetakan I, Jakarta, Elips II. Google Scholar

Khairandy, Ridwan. (2001). Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak sebagai Antisipasi Transaksi Electronic Commerce. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 8(16), 42–57. Google Scholar

Makarim, Edmon. (2015). Keautentikan Dokumen Publik Elektronik Dalam Administrasi Pemerintahan Dan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(4), 508–570. Google Scholar

Mamitoho, Refly Aditia. (2014). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 2(1). Google Scholar

Paton, G. W. (1956). Textbook Of Jurisprudance Book VI, diterjemahkan oleh G. Sodarsono, A. Harjoto Dan Ibnusantoso, Yogyakarta: Jajasan Badan Penerbit Gadjah Mada. Google Scholar

Pribadi, Insan. (2018). Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Lex Renaissance, 3(1), 4. Google Scholar