Sengketa Kandidat Calon Perseorangan dalam Pemilihan Umum Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Ketapang Tahun 2020 di Tingkat Kabupaten Masa Perbaikan

Authors

  • Gilang Mafliano Rachmatshah Universitas Tidar
  • Dyah Hayu Woro Indrasti Universitas Tidar
  • Lois Salwa Aurella Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i3.3748

Keywords:

state administrative law, case, decision, human behavior, plaintiff, judge

Abstract

This article examines and discusses the Supreme Court judge's decision regarding the results of the Individual Candidate Dispute in the 2020 Ketapang Regent and Deputy Regent General Election at the Regency Level during the Improvement Period. viewed from the perspective of State Administrative Law. seen from the case and the way the judge assesses the case and the judge's decision. In this article we use qualitative research methods, which focus on observation and in-depth research. pay attention to human behavior and what aspects influence it. This is realized by looking at what aspects make the plaintiff object and what aspects influence the judge to make a decision

References

Direktori putusan mahkamah agung 2022." sengketa pasangan calon perseorangan dalam pemilihan bupati dan wakil bupati Ketapang tahun 2020 di tingkat kabupaten masa perbaikan "

Rawls, John, 1973, A. Theory of justice, Londin : Oxford University

Sudjatmiko, 1984. Pembangunan dan Kebebasan. Jakarta : LP3ES

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Gilang Mafliano Rachmatshah, Dyah Hayu Woro Indrasti, & Lois Salwa Aurella. (2024). Sengketa Kandidat Calon Perseorangan dalam Pemilihan Umum Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Ketapang Tahun 2020 di Tingkat Kabupaten Masa Perbaikan. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 2(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i3.3748

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.