Sengketa Kandidat Calon Perseorangan dalam Pemilihan Umum Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Ketapang Tahun 2020 di Tingkat Kabupaten Masa Perbaikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i3.3748Keywords:
state administrative law, case, decision, human behavior, plaintiff, judgeAbstract
This article examines and discusses the Supreme Court judge's decision regarding the results of the Individual Candidate Dispute in the 2020 Ketapang Regent and Deputy Regent General Election at the Regency Level during the Improvement Period. viewed from the perspective of State Administrative Law. seen from the case and the way the judge assesses the case and the judge's decision. In this article we use qualitative research methods, which focus on observation and in-depth research. pay attention to human behavior and what aspects influence it. This is realized by looking at what aspects make the plaintiff object and what aspects influence the judge to make a decision
References
Direktori putusan mahkamah agung 2022." sengketa pasangan calon perseorangan dalam pemilihan bupati dan wakil bupati Ketapang tahun 2020 di tingkat kabupaten masa perbaikan "
Rawls, John, 1973, A. Theory of justice, Londin : Oxford University
Sudjatmiko, 1984. Pembangunan dan Kebebasan. Jakarta : LP3ES
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.