Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Meringankan Hukuman Richard Eliezer Ditinjau Berdasarkan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan

Authors

  • Syahla Putri Raharyanti Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Lies Sulistiani Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Rully Herdita Ramadhani Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i1.2452

Keywords:

Justice Collaborator, premeditated murder, witness, legal protection

Abstract

The Application of Justice Collaborator in the crime of premeditated murder is still considered unclear, this is based on the provisions in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, as well as SEMA Number 4 of 2011 which explains that a witness to a perpetrator who is a worker can appear in a confrontation at certain or special types of cases. These pros and cons reappear because a Justice Collaborator has the right to obtain leniency as a form of legal protection for perpetrator witnesses, even though the perpetrator is an important person in the case yet he is not an intellectual actor. Research shows several regulations governing Justice Collaborators, but they are not yet rigid and have finally expanded their meaning in their application. The provisions regarding the implementation of Justice Collaborator are considered to have an important existence in the criminal system.

 

 

References

A. Buku

Abidin, Farid, & Zainal, H. (2007). Hukum Pidana I. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Chazawi, A. (2013). Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh & Nyawa. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Lamintang, P., & Lamintang, F. T. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.

Marpaung, L. (2005). Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Marpaung, L. (2011). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika.

Muhammad, R. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mulyadi, L. (2008). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana: Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktik. Bandung: Alumni.

Prodjodikiro, W. (2003). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia . Jakarta: PT. Rafika Aditama.

Purnomo, B. (1984). Operasi Pemberantasan Kejahatan dan Kemanfaatan Ahli Kedokteran Jiwa. Yogyakarta: Bina Aksara.

Saleh, R. (1981). Perbuatan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Sulistiani, Lies. (2023). Hukum Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Teguh, P. (2011). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo.

Utrecht. (1994). Rangkaian Sari Kuliah: Hukum Pidana 1. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas.

B. Aturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana & Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-04

How to Cite

Syahla Putri Raharyanti, Lies Sulistiani, & Rully Herdita Ramadhani. (2024). Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Meringankan Hukuman Richard Eliezer Ditinjau Berdasarkan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i1.2452

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.