Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Ultimate Beneficiary Owner (UBN) yang Melakukan Gratifikasi Terhadap Pejabat
Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2205K/Pid.Sus/2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i1.2018Keywords:
ultimate beneficiary owner, legal liability, gratificationAbstract
Decision Number 2205 K/Pd/Sus/2022 The Supreme Court again upheld the acquittal decision of Samin Tan as the owner of PT Beneficial Ownershiprneo Lumbung Energi & Metal (PT BLEM). The panel is of the opinion that the giver of gratification cannot be punished because the Corruption Eradication Law is not designed to punish the giver of gratification even though Samin Tan's position as the giver of gratification is the ultimate beneficiary owner of PT BLEM. The research method used in this research is using normative juridical research methods and using literature study techniques to answer the problems in this research. The result of the discussion of the first problem formulation is that Samin Tan cannot be held criminally responsible because the person giving the gratification is not criminalized under the law even though Samin Tan is the ultimate beneficiary owner who has the potential to commit this act because it is in the interests of his company. The result of the discussion on the formulation of the second problem is that the judge's considerations in the decision did not prioritize a sense of justice and expediency because they only prioritized legal certainty which resulted in Samin Tan being able to escape the demands of the public prosecutor.
References
Dedy Saputra, (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menerima Gratifikasi Dengan Sistem Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau edisi Agustus 2017 – Januari 2018, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v7i1.4959
Djoko Prakoso, (1985). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty
I Putu Rian Septiadi. (2019), Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Seksual Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana Bali
Joyo Mulyo, (2023), Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v4i2.1484
Prodjohamidjojo Martiman, (1997). Memahami Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, JakartaL Pradnya Pramita
S.R Sianturi, (1996), Asas – Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Storia Grafika
Indonesia Corruption Watch Setengah Hati Transparansi Beneficial Ownership Korporasi, sebagaimana diakses pada https://antikorupsi.org/id/setengah-hati-transparansi-beneficial- ownership-korporasi tanggal 13 Oktober 2023
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Putusan Bebas Samin Tan: Tumpulnya Penegakan Hukum, sebagaimana diakses pada https://antikorupsi.org/id/putusan-bebas-samin-tan-tumpulnya-penegakan-hukum-kasus-korupsi tanggal 2 Oktober 2023
Inspektorat Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Gratifikasi, sebagaimana diakses pada link berikut: https://inspektorat.jatengprov.go.id/17/pages/gratifikasi pada tanggal 12 Oktober 2023
Mas Hushendar, Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Praperadilan, sebagaimana diakses pada Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum - Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Praperadilan (mahkamahagung.go.id) p
Nasoetion dkk, Masalah Alih Fungsi Lahan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Keberlangsungan Swasembada Pangan, Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Jakarta, 2000, hlm 67
Yonky Karman, “Indonesia Darurat Korupsi”, Indonesia Corruption Watch sebagaimana diakses pada link https://antikorupsi.org//id/article/indonesia-darurat-korupsi tanggal 3 Oktober 2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Isti Puspitasari, Erviyanti Rosmaida, Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
