Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Zenodo sebagai Repositori Pribadi untuk Meningkatkan Visibilitas dan Sitasi Karya Ilmiah Dosen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/jphm-widyakarya.v2i4.4439Keywords:
Zenodo, Repositori, Metadata, PublikasiAbstract
Training on the use of Zenodo as a personal repository for lecturers is a strategic initiative to increase the productivity and visibility of scientific works. Zenodo offers an open-source platform that enables publication management with features such as DOI and structured metadata, which are essential to support global citations and recognition. However, many lecturers do not understand the importance of using these private repositories, especially regarding the role of DOIs and metadata in strengthening their academic impact. For this reason, this training is designed with a comprehensive method, starting with the creation of training modules, publication in the academic community, and online implementation via Zoom. A hands-on lab approach is used to ensure participants understand and practice Zenodo management firsthand. The results of the training held in July 2024 showed a very high level of satisfaction, with 90% of participants feeling very satisfied and the rest satisfied. Participants came from various regions in Indonesia, including lecturers, library staff, and LPPM staff, who were interested in using Zenodo for institutional needs. The discussion revealed that most lecturers still have a minimal understanding of the importance of DOI and metadata, as well as how personal repositories can support the management of academic positions. This training provides new awareness of the importance of managing scientific works that are integrated with digital technology. In conclusion, Zenodo training has a positive impact on building technical and strategic understanding of lecturers, although further training is still needed to delve into metadata management and Zenodo optimization at the institutional level. With the right approach, this training not only improves individual competence, but also strengthens the academic competitiveness of the institution at the global level.
References
Araújo, A. A. C., Silva, Í. R., & Mendes, I. A. C. (2022). Editorial Policy, DOI and (in)visibility of scientific publications. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 30(02), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0000.3732
Dillen, M., Groom, Q., Agosti, D., & Nielsen, L. (2019). Zenodo, an Archive and Publishing Repository: A tale of two herbarium specimen pilot projects. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37080
Helbig, K., Hausstein, B., & Toepfer, R. (2015). Supporting Data Citation: Experiences and Best Practices of a DOI Allocation Agency for Social Sciences. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3, 1220. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:58800220
Krishnamurthy, D. M., Deshpande, D. B. S., & Sajana, D. C. (2021). Crosswalk among Prominent Open Research Data Repositories. Webology, 18(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v18i2/web18307
Lena Pavlovska, Е. (2017). Digital Object Identifier (DOI) – an Important Element in Scientific Communication. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 7(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2017.7.7
Muchidin, A. N. S. (2024). PENGELOLAAN METADATA DI PEMERINTAHAN: PENTINGNYA KUALITAS DATA DALAM MENYEDIAKAN DATA YANG AKURAT, STUDI KASUS DI INSTITUT PEMERINTAHAN DALAM NEGERI. INFOTECH Journal, 10(2), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.31949/infotech.v10i2.11095
Nielsen, L. H., Gonzalez Lopez, J. B., Smith, T., & Ioannidis, A. (2022). Zenodo data repository: Providing practical solutions for data storage and data sharing. Regulatory Affairs Watch, 4(7), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.54920/SCTO.2022.RAWatch.7.25
Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. I. (2017). Zenodo in the Spotlight of Traditional and New Metrics. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00013
Ramstrand, N., Fatone, S., Dillon, M. P., & Hafner, B. J. (2020). Sharing research data. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 44(2), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364620915020
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Härtig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands‐on activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 980–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Sewell, R. R., Potvin, S., Melgoza, P., Creel, J. S., Huff, J. T., Bailey, G. T., Bondurant, J., Buckner, S., DuPlessis, A. R., Furubotten, L., Mosbo Ballestro, J. A., Muise, I. W., & Wright, B. J. (2019). When a Repository Is Not Enough: Redesigning a Digital Ecosystem to Serve Scholarly Communication. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 7(1), 0–21. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2225
Simons, N. (2012). Implementing DOIs for Research Data. D-Lib Magazine, 18(5/6). https://doi.org/10.1045/may2012-simons
Swan, A., & Carr, L. (2008). Institutions, Their Repositories and the Web. Serials Review, 34(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765149
Wicaksono, S. R. (2024). Zenodo untuk dosen dan peneliti.
