Dispute Resolution Of "Supreme" Brand Rights: (Study of Review Decision Number 37 Pk/Pdt. Sus-Hki/2023)

Nafis Dwi Kartiko; Samuel Putra Soegiono; Mohammad Syafi'ur Rohman; Dave David Tedjokusumo; Carissa Amanda Siswanto

doi:10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i3.3246

Authors

Nafis Dwi Kartiko Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
Samuel Putra Soegiono Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
Mohammad Syafi'ur Rohman Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
Dave David Tedjokusumo Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
Carissa Amanda Siswanto Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i3.3246

Keywords:

Brand Rights, Trademark Disputes, Judicial Review

Abstract

In an era of globalization that has a significant impact on industry and commerce, trademark rights disputes are a crucial issue that needs serious attention. One trademark rights dispute that has attracted attention is the case of "Supreme," which is the focus of this study by detailing the Review Decision Number 37 PK/PDT. SUS-HKI/2023. This dispute involves companies with the trademark "Supreme," and its resolution has an important impact on trademark law in Indonesia. This research aims to dig deeper into the resolution of trademark rights disputes through these case studies. Analysis of court decisions, judges' considerations, and the legal basis used will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the trademark dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia. Through this search, it is expected to find significant contributions to the development of trademark rights regulations and dispute resolution at the national level. This research uses normative juridical method with statutes approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The result of this research is that the trademark dispute resolution process in Indonesia follows predetermined legal steps, starting from filing a lawsuit in the District Court, continuing with the cassation process in the Supreme Court, and can reach the review stage in the Supreme Court if necessary. This approach reflects Indonesia's seriousness in handling brand disputes fairly and efficiently. The study also emphasizes the importance of good faith in the trademark registration process.

References

Abdurofiq, A. (2014). Menakar pengaruh masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN 2015 terhadap pembangunan Indonesia. 1(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v1i2.1543

Alfarizi, M., & F, M. A. T. (2021). Harmonisasi Prinsip Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Konvensi Paris Dalam Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Jurnal Pro Hukum, 10(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v10i2.1589

Ambler, T. (1997). Do brands benefit consumers? International Journal of Advertising, 16(3), 167–198. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-0487.1997.00053.x

Amira, A. P., Saidin, S., Azwar, K. D., & Leviza, J. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Atas Penggunaan Animasi Kartun Terkenal Sebagai Merek Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1105 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018). Iuris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(2), 294–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i2.135

Appelbaum, E., & Schettkat, R. (1995). Employment and productivity in industrialized economies. Int’l Lab. Rev., 134, 605.

Denny, Liegestu, Y. P., Novika, & Patros, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek di Indonesia: Studi Putusan. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377

Desmayanti, R. (2018). Tinjauan Umum Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Sebagai Daya Pembeda Menurut Perspektif Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v6i1.874.

Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten, V. (2017). Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: what is the connection? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.081030

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Montanari, M. G., Giraldi, J. de M. E., & Galina, S. V. R. (2020). Relationship between country brand and internationalization: a literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(7), 2148–2165. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0277

Ogbimi, F. E. (2015). Solution to mass unemployment in Nigeria (Issue 1). Society for Linking Education and Problems.

Ong, I. A. (2013). Analisa pengaruh strategi diferensiasi, citra merek, kualitas produk dan harga terhadap keputusan pembelian pelanggan di Cincao Station Grand City, Surabaya. Jurnal Strategi Pemasaran, 1(2), 1–11.

Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B., & Lal, K. (2016). Structural Transformation and Economic Development: Cross regional analysis of industrialization and urbanization. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315560885

Pinem, L. E. N., & Gunadi, N. L. D. S. (2021). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Hak Merek Atas Putusan Geprek Bensu Melawan I Am Geprek Bensu. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, 2(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jpss.v2i1.452

Syahril, S., Noviar, H., Damrus, D., Anas, A., & Sari, Y. P. (2022). Kontribusi Bea Cukai Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Regional Khususnya di Kabupaten Aceh Barat. Jurnal Pengabdian Agro and Marine Industry, 2(1), 1–7. http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/agromarine/article/view/4836/2892

Wheeler, A. (2017). Designing brand identity: an essential guide for the whole branding team. John Wiley & Sons.

Yusnita, M., & Wahyudin, N. (2017). Entrepreneurial leadership through innovation capacity as an effort to increase competitive advantage of UMKM in Era of ASEAN economic community (MEA)(Micro Business Study in Kabupaten Bangka). Integrated Journal of Business and Economics, 1(1), 10–18. https://ojs.ijbe-research.com/index.php/IJBE/article/view/22