Inkonsistensi Ketentuan Pidana Terhadap Tujuan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penambangan Mineral dan Batubara

Authors

  • Christiadi Yanuar Saputro Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i1.294

Keywords:

Criminal Provisions, Mining Law

Abstract

Criminal provisions in a statutory regulation are certain doses or remedies as a means of achieving the formulated goals. The purpose of this article is to examine and analyze the inconsistency of the material content of the criminal provisions against the formulation of the objectives of legal certainty in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. The research method uses a normative juridical method. Secondary data in the form of primary legal data on laws and regulations related to the criminal provisions of the Minerba Law is elaborated so that the adequacy of the content of the criminal provisions is able to test the clarity of the objectives of legal certainty.

The results found that there were inconsistencies in criminal provisions as a means of achieving goals in the formulation of guaranteeing legal certainty. The application of Article 162 of the Mineral and Coal Law is subjective and tends to criminalize members of the community around mineral and coal mining. This fact proves that the objective of legal certainty is objective, ambiguous with subjective criminal means. The main article of criminal provisions in the Minerba Law is Article 158 which is systematically constructed with Article 35. Basically, the criminal provisions are used as the legal regime for licensing in the strategies and techniques of government control and control in the mineral and coal sector.

References

Barda Nawawi Arief. 2012. Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pidana Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Pustaka Magister, Semarang

Kertas Kerja Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil, 2016, Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Advokasi RUU Minerba, Jakarta

Mario Julyano dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. 2019. Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum, Jurnal Crepido, Volume 01, Nomor 01, Juli 2019

Muhaimin. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram : Universitas Mataram Indonesia

Satjipto Rahardjo. 1982. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni

Tim Pokja. 2020. Laporan Akhir Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Terkait Pengelolaan Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara yang Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: BPHN Kemenkumham

Lain-lain :

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, 2008, Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Downloads

Published

2023-02-25

How to Cite

Christiadi Yanuar Saputro. (2023). Inkonsistensi Ketentuan Pidana Terhadap Tujuan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 1(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i1.294

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.