Pelindungan Hak Ekonomi Terhadap Pencipta Sinematografi Digital: Studi Perbandingan Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia dan Jerman

Authors

  • Praxedis Ajeng Pradita Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Eddy Damian Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Tasya Safiranita Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i1.2098

Keywords:

Remuneration, CMO, Creator, Digital Platform, Cinematography

Abstract

Cinematographic work is protected by law under the Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 in Indonesia. The fundamental principle is that the Creator is entitled to fair remuneration for the use of their work, in line with the alter-ego concept that gives the highest position to the Creator. In contrast to Indonesia, Germany has clearly regulated the procedures for the collection, management, and distribution of remuneration through the Urheberrechtsgesetz and the Collective Management Organization (CMO) operating with authorization from the Creator. The research method used is juridical-normative with a descriptive analysis approach. This study applies a comparative legal approach, utilizing data from both conventional and online literary sources, as well as interviews. The research findings indicate that Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations to protect the economic rights of digital cinematography. The absence of a Collective Management Organization (CMO) leads to an imbalance in licensing agreements between the Creator and digital platforms as users of cinematographic works.

References

Artikel Jurnal

Agung Kurniawan Sihombing et.al. (2021). Comparison of Digital Copyright Protection on Over the Top (OTT) Streaming Content Media in Indonesia and the United States. PJIH, 8(2), 186. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/view/32422/16161

Ahmad M. Ramli et.al (2016). Collaboration Principles between Telecommunication Operators and Over The Top (OTT) Platform Provider in the Context of the Job Creation Regulation. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 4(3), 13. https://jtde.telsoc.org/index.php/jtde/article/view/461

David Perell. (2016). Models of Internet Monetization. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 7(1), 3. https://www.inquiriesjournal.com/article-images/j3/i79/original.pdf

Fitri Astari et.al. (2020). Perlindungan Hak Cipta pada Platform Digital Kreatif YouTube. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 10(2), 152. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/10368

Guy Forte. (2022). Just A Little Bit: Comparing The De Minimis Doctrine in U.S. and German Copyright Regimes. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 39(3), 441. http://arizonajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Forte-Final.pdf

Haryono et.al. (2017). Pengakuan dan Pelindungan Hak Cipta Tinjauan Secara Filosofis dan Teoritis. Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS, 6(2), 51. https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/civis/article/view/1904/1516

Hendra Tanu Atmadja. (2003). Konsep Hak Ekonomi dan Hak Moral Pencipta Menurut Sistem Civil Law dan Common Law. Jurnal Hukum, 23(10), 154. file:///C:/Users/Owner/Downloads/4763-Article%20Text-6159-7556-10-20160603.pdf

Lailatusafa’ah Indrasrani. (2018). Perubahan Status Penerima Lisensi Terhadap Perjanjian Lisensi Hak Cipta. Jurnal Populis, 3(6), 867. http://journal.unas.ac.id/populis/article/view/475/375

Tasya Safiranita et.al. (2021). Copyrighted Content Commercialization on OTT Media in Indonesia. CSIR-NIScPR Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 26, 356. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/bitstream/123456789/59058/1/JIPR%2026%286%29%20351-356.pdf

Tasya Safiranita et.al, (2019). The Protection of Content in Media Over the Top and Telecommunication Network in INDONESIA Copyright Law Perspective. NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 8(2), 62.

Tasya S. Ramli et.al. (2022). Artificial intelligence as object of intellectual property in Indonesian law. Journal of World Intellectual Property,26(2), 148-150. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12264

Sebastian A. Lendeng et.al. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Hak Cipta Dalam Bidang Karya Sinematografi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Lex Privatum, 9(2), 170. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/33161

Yulia Nizwana & Rahdiansyah. (2019). Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Ditinjau dari Epistimologi. UIR Law Review, 3(2) , 36. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/4006/2304

Disertasi/Tesis/Paper Kerja

Ahmad Asadullah et.al. (2019). Digital Platform: A Review and Future Directions,. Paper: Literature Review on Digital Platform.

Gloria Immanuella. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Ekonomi Berkaitan dengan Pembagian Royalti Layanan Multimedia Video-On-Demand Netflix Ditinjau dari Undang – Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Skripsi: Universitas Padjadjaran.

Buku Teks

Eddy Damian. (2022). Hukum Hak Cipta, Edisi VI, Bandung: PT Alumni.

Ephraim Kate. (1979). The Film Encyclopedia, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Publisher.

Gatot Supramono. (2009). Hak Cipta dan Aspek-Aspek Hukumnya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. (2006). Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.

Ranti Fauza Mayana. (2004). Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia Dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas. Jakarta : Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Rika Ratna Permata et.al. (2022). Hak Cipta Era Digital dan Pengaturan Doktrin Fair Use di Indonesia. Jambi: Salim Media Indonesia.

R. Soeroso. (2010). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Soewarno. (1977). Teori – Teori Politik I, Jakarta: Bina Cipta.

Tasya Safiranita Ramli. (2023). Hak Cipta dalam Perspektif Cyberlaw, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Tasya Safiranita Ramli. (2022). Hak Cipta dalam Media Over The Top, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Tim Lindsey et.al. (2019). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Sumber Internet

CISAC Study. (2018). Remuneration Right for Audiovisual Authors by Raquel Xalabarder. CISAC Legal & Policy Department. Available at: https://www.cisac.org/sites/main/files/files/2020-11/AV%2BRemuneration%2BStudy-EN.pdf, pada tanggal 18 September 2023.

DW Made for Minds. (2023). Disomasi Sutradara Film, Begini Respons Kemendikbud dan TVRI. Available at: https://www.dw.com/id/disomasi-sutradara-sejauh-kumelangkah-kemendikbud-akui-adanya-kendala-administrasi/a-55160463, diakses tanggal 18 September 2023.

GWFF. (2023). Distribution Plans of GWFF GmbH for revenues collected in Germany. Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Film- und Fernsehrecthen mbH. Available at: https://www.gwff.de/en.distribution-plan.html, diakses tanggal 20 Juni 2023.

Kompas.com. (2020). Pelaku Pembajakan Film Mencuri Raden Saleh Terancam Hukuman 10 Tahun Penjara dan Denda Rp 10 Miliar. Available at: https://www.kompas.com/hype/read/2022/09/22/104903066/pelaku-pembajakan-film-mencuri-raden-saleh-terancam-hukuman-10-tahun#google_vignette, diakses tanggal 18 September 2023.

Peraturan dan Putusan Pengadilan

Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.

Urheberrechtsgesetz of 23 June 2021 Amendment to Act of 9 September 1965.

Putusan dengan Nomor Perkara 762/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jmb tertanggal 27 April 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-11

How to Cite

Praxedis Ajeng Pradita, Eddy Damian, & Tasya Safiranita. (2023). Pelindungan Hak Ekonomi Terhadap Pencipta Sinematografi Digital: Studi Perbandingan Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia dan Jerman. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 2(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i1.2098

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.