Penerapan Asas Hakim Pasif terhadap Permohonan Dispensasi Perkawinan di Pengadilan Agama Soreang

Gheviera Najla; Djanuardi Djanuardi; Hazar Kusmayanti

doi:10.59581/doktrin.v3i1.4480

Authors

Gheviera Najla Universitas Padjadjaran
Djanuardi Djanuardi Universitas Padjadjaran
Hazar Kusmayanti Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v3i1.4480

Keywords:

Civil Procedure Law, Marriage Dispensation, Passive Judge Principle, Underage Marriage

Abstract

The Marriage Law regulates the minimum age limit for marriage is 19 (nineteen) years, but in practice underage marriages still often occur so that these marriages cannot be registered. Marriage dispensation becomes the legal legitimacy so that underage marriages can be registered in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law. Marriage dispensation is obtained through the courts by involving the application of civil procedural law principles, including the principle of passive judges. This study aims to obtain an overview of the application of the passive judge principle and the limitations of active judges to the application for marriage dispensation at the Soreang Religious Court in relation to civil procedural law in the case of the application for underage marriage dispensation in Decision Number 421/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Sor. The research method and legal writing are carried out using a normative legal approach sourced from primary data and secondary data. Primary data is taken through interviews, then the secondary data used comes from literature studies. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the application of the passive judge principle in marriage dispensation cases is dynamic and adjusted to the best interests of the child. The active role of the judge in providing advice and conducting in-depth examinations does not conflict with the passive judge principle, but is an effort to ensure a fair decision and protect the rights of the child.

References

Afriani, A., Rahmawati, E., Mantili, R., & Putri, S.A., (2022). Batasan Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Pada Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 142-154.

Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).

Judiasih, S.D., (2023). Kontroversi Perkawinan Bawah Umur: Realita dan Tantangan Bagi Penegakan Hukum Keluarga di Indonesia, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, 6(2), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v6i2.1295

Judiasih, S.D., Rubiati, B., & Yuanitasari. D., (2018). Kebijakan Pemerintah Terkait dengan Wajib Belajar: Upaya Menekan Praktik Perkawinan Bawah Umur di Indonesia. Bandung: Cakra.

Judiasih, S.D., Sudini, L.P., Rubiati, B., Yuanitasari. D., Kusmayanti, H., & Salim, E.F., (2019). Sustainable Development Goals: Upaya Penghapusan Perkawinan Bawah Umur di Indonesia. Bandung: Cakra.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Mertukusumo, S., (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahya Atma Pusaka.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin

Syahrani, R. (1988). Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Pusat Katini.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama.

Zulfiani (2017). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Perkawinan bawah umur di Bawah Umur Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 12(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.2013/jhsk.v12i2.136