Tanggung Jawab PT. Pos Indonesia Terhadap Konsumen dalam Pengiriman Barang yang Hilang atau Mengalami Kerusakan pada Barang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 di Kota Atambua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i3.3366Keywords:
Responsibility of PT Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch, Lost and Damaged Goods, Factors Hindering the Implementation of ResponsibilityAbstract
Public services today are additional needs whose role is very important in society because they can relieve the community and help national development which aims to realize a just and prosperous society in the era of economic democracy. However, public services are indeed loaded with various problems, what's more, the range itself is very wide, covering both the profit and non-profit sectors. One of the means of shipping goods that can be used is PT Pos Indonesia. Atambua Branch Post Office is one of the branches of PT Pos Indonesia which operates for the Belu Regency area, East Nusa Tenggara Province. The formulation of the problems in this study are (1) How is the responsibility given by PT. Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch for the delivery of lost or damaged goods? (2) How are the obstacles to the implementation of the responsibility for lost or damaged goods provided by PT. Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch? The type of research used by the author is Empirical Legal research, the type of data used in this research is qualitative data. The data used in the research based on the relevance of the source data, namely primary and secondary data. The results of the study suggest that: (1) Liability for lost shipments by PT Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch, namely by providing compensation of 1 (one) x shipping costs and plus one time compensation guarantee that has been included in the proof of delivery receipt. If the shipment is damaged but part of the shipment can still be functioned, PT Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch provides compensation of 1 (one) x shipping costs and plus half x the cost of the guarantee of compensation that has been included in the proof of delivery receipt, but if it is totally damaged and loses its function, it will be given compensation of 1 (one) x shipping costs and add 1 (one) x the cost of compensation that has been included in the proof of delivery receipt. (2) The inhibiting factors are the lack of communication between PT Pos Indonesia and service users, negligence from PT Pos Indonesia Atambua Branch (Courier) which still often closes communication with the Foreman related to these problems.
References
Aan Komariah, & Djama’an Satori. (2011). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Abdullah, M. (n.d.). Pendidikan karakter: Membangun karakter anak sejak dini. Yogyakarta: Pedagogja.
Aka Hawari. (2012). Guru yang berkarakter kuat. Jogjakarta: Laksana.
Arif Santosa. (n.d.). Kamus umum bahasa Indonesia. Mahkota Kita.
Az. Nasution. (n.d.). Hukum perlindungan konsumen: Suatu pengantar. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bagong Suyanto, & Sutina. (n.d.). Metode penelitian sosial: Berbagi alternatif pendekatan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Bahari, A. F. (2020). Analisis kualitas layanan dalam upaya meningkatkan kepuasan narapidana di Lapas Narkotika Kelas II A Pamekasan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora.
Burhanuddin. (n.d.). Pemikiran hukum perlindungan konsumen dan sertifikasi halal. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.
Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti. (2014). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Company Profile PT. Pos Indonesia. (n.d.).
Heksa Fitriandi. (2014). Tanggung jawab PT. Pos Indonesia terhadap pengangkutan barang elektronik yang rusak di Kota Pontianak (Skripsi). Pontianak: UNTAN.
K. Martono, & Ahmad Sudiro. (2011). Hukum angkatan udara berdasarkan UU RI No 1 Tahun 2009. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kurniawan. (2011). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Malang: UB Press.
Lexi J. Moleong. (2008). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mukti Fajar ND, & Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan hukum empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mustari, M. (n.d.). Karakter refleksi untuk pendidikan karakter. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.
Nana Sujana, & Ahwal Kusuma. (n.d.). Proposal penelitian di perguruan tinggi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nanda Fadli. (2018). Tanggung jawab PT. Pos Indonesia Cabang Pontianak atas kehilangan barang kiriman milik pengiriman di Kota Pontianak. E-Journal Fatwa Hukum Faculty of Law Universitas.
Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 15 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1995 tentang Pengalihan Bentuk Perusahaan Umum (Perum) Pos dan Giro Menjadi Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero).
Shidarta. (2000). Hukum perlindungan konsumen Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Siti Yuli Yanti. (2022). Tanggung jawab PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero) atas terjadinya wanprestasi dalam pelaksanaan pengiriman barang (Skripsi). Padang: UNDALAS.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2008). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ulber Silalahi. (2009). Metode penelitian sosial. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 2009 tentang Pos.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Yusuf Shofie. (n.d.). Perlindungan konsumen dan instrumen-instrumen hukumnya. Jakarta: Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
