Penyelesaian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Objeknya Dialihkan Oleh Debitur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i1.2251Keywords:
Fiduciary Guarantee, Diverted, DebtorAbstract
This study aims to determine the position of the object of the fiduciary guarantee transferred by the debtor based on the agreement with PT. Pegadaian and to determine the efforts to settle the credit transferred by the debtor. This research was conducted at PT. Pegadaian Pasar Butung Makassar and used the Normative-Empirical research type method. The approach is carried out with literature in reality based on interviews and documentation. The results of the study indicate that to determine the legal position of the object of the fiduciary guarantee transferred by the debtor, registration is required. PT. Pegadaian does not register a fiduciary guarantee in its entirety with consideration of costs, so that the legal position of the object of the fiduciary guarantee has a legal weakness in the sense of lack of legal certainty for creditors, because the debtor has violated the provisions of Article 23 paragraph (2). In addition, to settle loans with fiduciary guarantees whose objects are transferred by the debtor, PT. Pegadaian takes a negotiation method with the debtor and the third party who receives the transfer of the object of the fiduciary guarantee, namely by replacing the object of the collateral transferred to the third party with the object belonging to the debtor whose value is equivalent to the object of the guarantee that has been transferred, because PT. Pegadaian has material rights over the object of collateral.
References
Ahmadi Miru, 2011, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Cetakan Keempat, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Frieda Husni Hasbullah, 2005, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata; Hak – Hak yang Memberi Jaminan Jilid II, Cetakan Kedua, Ind – Hill – Co, Jakarta.
I Ketut Oka Setiawan, 2018, Hukum Perikatan, Cetakan Ketiga, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Ismantoro Dwi Yuwono, 2013, Baca Buku ini Sebelum Tanda Tangan Surat Perjanjian, Cetakan Pertama, Pustaka Yustika, Yogyakarta.
Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih, 2019, Kausa yang Halal dan Kedudukan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Hukum Perjanjan, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kartika Muljadi dan Gunawan Widjaja, 2010, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian, Cetakan Kelima, PT.RajaGeafindo,Jakarta.
Mariam Darus Badrulzaman dkk, 2016, Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan, Cetakan Kedua, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Rachmad Setiawan, 2020, Hukum Perikatan Ajaran Umum Perjanjian, Cetakan Pertama, Yrama Widya, Bandung.
Rachmadi Usman, 2008, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Cetakan Ketiga, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Simanjuntak, 2017, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Cetakan Ketiga, Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, Jakarta.
Tan Kamello, 2015, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia; Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan, Cetakan Pertama, Alumni, Bandung.
Zaeni Asyhadie, 2018, Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia; Kajian Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional dan Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah, Cetakan Pertama, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok.
Jurnal
Ardika Karya Santuso, 2016,Penyelesaian Debitur Wanprestasi dengan Jaminan Fidusia, Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Universitas Jember, diakses pada 16 Januari 2021, pukul 22.30
Retna Gumanti, 2012, Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian; Ditinjau dari KUHPerdata, Volume 5 Nomor 1, Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu.
Tami Rusli, 2015, Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Sebagai Dasar Perkembangan Perjanjian di indonesia, Volume 10 Nomor 1, Jurnal Pranata Hukum.
Internet
Hendri, 2019, Pengertian, subjek, objek, tata cara pendaftaran, eksekusi dan hapusnya jaminan fidusia, https://butew.com/2019/03/24/pengertiansubjekobjektata-carapendaftaraneksekusi-dan-hapusnya-jaminan-fidusia/,diakses pada 28 Januari 2021, pukul 18.38.
Peraturan Perundang – Undangan
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang – Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.