Keabsahan Permohonan Pailit Yang Diajukan Buruh Terhadap Perusahaan Terkait Pemenuhan Haknya

Rebecca Purba; Safina Nabila Fikrie; Diva Salsabila Ferdiansyah; Angelia Carla; Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho

doi:10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1814

Authors

Rebecca Purba Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta
Safina Nabila Fikrie Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta
Diva Salsabila Ferdiansyah Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta
Angelia Carla Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta
Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta
Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho Universitas Pembangunan Negeri “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1814

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Debt, Criminal Code

Abstract

In the second quarter of 2020, Commercial Courts in Indonesia handled 132 bankruptcy cases. In the first semester of 2020, the number of bankruptcy cases handled by the Commercial Court in Indonesia increased to 233 cases, including 43 cases handled by the Central Jakarta Commercial Court. The aim of bankruptcy is basically to provide a solution to the parties if the Debtor stops paying/is unable to pay his debts. Bankruptcy prevents/avoids unfair actions that can harm all parties, namely: avoiding execution by creditors and preventing fraud by the debtor himself. Bankruptcy is a legal institution that has an important function, namely as the realization of two important articles in the Civil Code regarding the debtor's responsibility for the obligations carried out, namely Articles 1131 and 1132. This research aims to determine the validity of the bankruptcy petition submitted by workers to the compliance company. his rights. This research uses normative juridical legal research methods. In this research, what is emphasized is the aspect of law application which is carried out integrally with morality. The research results show that a worker's bankruptcy petition is a petition submitted by workers or labor unions to the commercial court to declare the company where they work bankrupt. A worker's bankruptcy application can be filed if the company does not pay wages, allowances and other rights that should be paid to workers.

References

Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Buku

Situmorang, Victor M. dan Hendri Soekarso. (1994). Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Jurnal

Fatoni, Ahmad & Gultom, lfrida Ratnawati. (2023). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 515 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2013 Terkait Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor terhadap Itikad Buruk Debitur dalam Permohonan Pailit. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 7(1).

Harahap. (2023). Implementasi Pembagian Harta Debitur Pailit oleh Kurator atas Upah Pekerja yang Terhutang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 67/Puu-Xi/2013. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 7(1).

Hindrawan, P., Sunarmi, S., Ginting, B., & Harianto, D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Menerapkan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Parte dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(8), 720–732.

Saifullah, Aries. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Rangka Pengajuan Permohonan Pailit (Studi Kasus PT. Cowel Development). Jurisdiction, 5(6).

Saija, Ronald. (2017). Rekonstruksi Kompetensi Pengadilan Niaga dan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dalam Melindungi Upah Hak Tenaga Kerja sebagai Kreditor Preferen pada Perusahaan Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER (JHAPER), 3(2).

Tan, Kendry. (2022). Mencegah Kepailitan Debitur saat Pandemi Covid-19: Manfaat Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang & Insolvency Test?. Journal of Judicial Review (JJR), 24(2).