Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Studi Kasus Pada Peningkatan Jalan Nanti Agung - Dusun Baru Kabupaten Seluma

Authors

  • Jekson Saragih Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Esra Natasya Br Sitepu Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Reh Bungana Br PA Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Maulana Ibrahim Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1727

Keywords:

Corporate Criminal Responsibility, Corruption, Identification Theory, Strict Liability, Vicarious Liability

Abstract

Corruption crimes that occur in Indonesia are increasingly developing in various sectors and are not only carried out by individuals but by corporations. However, the fact is that law enforcement still rarely touches cases of crimes committed by corporations, let alone holding these corporations accountable. The problems raised in this paper are: 1) What is the criminal responsibility of corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption in the case of the Nanti Agung road improvement project, Seluma Regency. 2) What were the judge's legal considerations in sentencing 8 suspects, including the former Head of the Seluma DPU Department? The approach method used in this research is literature study. Based on the research, the following results were obtained: 1) Corporate criminal liability as perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption in the case of the Nanti Agung road improvement project, Seluma Regency is the imposition of criminal liability on 8 suspects including the former Head of the Seluma DPU Department. 2) The basis of the judge's legal considerations in sentencing to 8 suspects, including the former Head of the Seluma DPU, was that the elements of the Corruption Crime were fulfilled, juridical considerations, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors. The author believes that the appropriate model of criminal liability is the imposition of criminal liability on corporations and corporate managers, so that there is a deterrent effect for corporations.

References

Apriyanta,dkk. (2020). Pencucian uang dalam tindak pidana narkkotika. Jurnal Hukum, 1-10.

Arisma Freddy Manalu, dkk. (2021). Penerapan hukum pidana terhadap pencucian uang dalam tindak pidana kejahatan narkotika. Jurnal Ilmiah, 1-23.

BADARUDDIN, K. A. (2018). Tipologi Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Pusat pelaporan dan Analisi transaksi keuangan Indonesia Buku.

Eko Satrio. (2019). Pertanggungawaban pidana korporasi terhadap tindak pidana usaha penyediaan listrik tanpa izin. Palembang: -.

Rully Trie Prasetyo,Dkk. (2017). Tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana. Jurnal Hukum, 1-15.

Sofia Yonas,dkk. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum, 1-10.

Tambunan, M. P. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana KOrporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1-18.

Tim NRA Indonesia. (2015). Penilaian Resiko Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Pusat pelaporan dan analisis transaksi keuangan Indonesia.

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011

Downloads

Published

2023-11-11

How to Cite

Jekson Saragih, Esra Natasya Br Sitepu, Reh Bungana Br PA, & Maulana Ibrahim. (2023). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Pada Peningkatan Jalan Nanti Agung - Dusun Baru Kabupaten Seluma. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(4), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1727

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.