Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Stoikiometri Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Lima Tingkat di SMA Negeri 4 Gorontalo

Miftahul Nur; Nurhayati Bialangi; Julhim S. Tangio; Erni Mohamad; Erga Kurniawati; Astin Lukum

doi:10.59581/konstanta.v2i4.4393

Authors

Miftahul Nur Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Nurhayati Bialangi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Julhim S. Tangio Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Erni Mohamad Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Erga Kurniawati Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Astin Lukum Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/konstanta.v2i4.4393

Keywords:

Concept Understanding, Five Tier, Stoichiometry

Abstract

The principles of chemistry learning emphasize that students study chemical concept in a structure and detailed manner. Until now, chemistry lessons are still a big challenge for teachers, because students often experience difficulties when learning chemical concept such as the concept of stoichiometry. This study aims to determine the level of concept understanding and the percentage of students' concept understanding on stoichiometry material using a five tier diagnostic test. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results showed: (1) the average level of students' concept understanding is classified in the category of lack of knowledge (LK); (2) the average percentage of students who understand the concept (SC) is 13.0% and the sub-concept with the highest percentage of understanding the concept (SC) is Relative Molecular Mass which is 33.0%. Of the 15 questions tested, question number 1 has the highest percentage of understanding the concept (SC) of 33.0%, while for the other 14 questions the average student is classified in the category of lack of knowledge (LK). It can be concluded that students' concept understanding on stoichiometry material is still classified as very low criteria.

References

Larutan Penyangga dalam Pembelajaran Multiple Representasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 2192–2200.

Anintia, R., Sadhu, S., & Annisa, D. (2017). Identify Students ’ Concept Understanding Using Three - Tier Multiple Choice Questions ( TTMCs ) on Stoichiometry. 2(1), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16734

Auliana, M. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Yang Dialami Siswa Kelas X MAN Indrapuri Dalam Menentukan Massa Atom Relatif (Ar) Dan Massa Molekul Relatif (Mr). Skripsi. Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Darussalam-Banda Aceh, 1–92.

Câmara Olim, S., Nisi, V., & Romão, T. (2024). Augmented reality interactive experiences for multi-level chemistry understanding. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 42(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100681

Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah, N., & Elvinawati, E. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. Alotrop, 5(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v5i1.16487

Karim, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Stoikiometri Menggunakan Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test di SMA Negeri 8 Kota Tangerang Selatan. Skripsi. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, Universitas Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Lailiyah, S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Materi Gelombang Bunyi: Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Konsepsi Berformat Five-Tier, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas serta Uji Terbatas. Jurnal Pendidikan FisikaTadulakoOnline (JPFT), 8(3), 104–119.

Lintong, K., Bialangi, N., & Pikoli, M. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pogil Terhadap Reduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Konsep Redoks di SMA Negeri 1 Tapa. 13, 215–220.

Mohamad, E., Iyabu, H., Wiwiyani, W., Sihaloho, M., Bialangi, N., & Kilo, A. La. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Sel Volta dan Sel Elektrolisis dengan Menggunakan Tes Open-Ended Problem. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i2.14492

Musa, W. J. A., Mantuli, M. A., Tangio, J. S., & Iyabu, H. (2023). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Tingkat Representasi Makroskopik , Mikroskopik , dan Simbolik pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(1), 52–59.

Norjana, R., Santosa, & Joharmawan, R. (2016). Identifikasi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Hukum Hukum Dasar Kimia dan Penerapannya Dalam Stoikiometri Pada Siswa Kelas X Ipa Di Man 3 Malang. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 1(2).

Pahrun, A. W., Sihaloho, M., Latief, S. A., & Pikoli, M. (2023). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kimia pada Materi Konsep Mol. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(I), 60–66.

Putra, A. S. U., Hamidah, I., & Nahadi. (2020). The development of five-tier diagnostic test to identify misconceptions and causes of students’ misconceptions in waves and optics materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022020

Rahmat, F. L. A., Suwatno, S., & Rasto, R. (2018). Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Melalui Teams Games Tournament (Tgt): Meta Analisis. Jurnal MANAJERIAL, 17(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v17i2.11783

Rumape, O., Pomuato, S., Mohamad, E., Ischak, N. I., Salimi, Y. K., Munandar, H., & Najmah, N. (2023). Identifikasi Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Materi Koloid. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i1.13215

Sa’adah, A. N. K. (2021). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Kelas XI Pada Materi Stoikiometri Berbasis Conditional Knowledge Di MAN 1 Lamongan. Skripsi. Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo.

Seliwati, S. (2021). Kemampuan Memahami Persamaan Reaksi Kimia Di Era Pembelajaran Digital Pada Siswa Kelas X Mipa Sman 5 Palangka Raya. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.112.07

Wahyuningsih, T., T. Raharjo, & D.F. Masithoh. (2013). Pembuatan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Fisika SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 111-117.

Zakiyah, Ibnu, S., & Subandi. (2018). Analisis Dampak Kesulitan Siswa pada Materi Stoikiometri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Termokimia. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(1), 119–134.