Hukuman Bagi Pencuri (Studi Komparatif Antara Madzhab Syafi’i Dan Madzhab Az-Zahiri)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i4.1857Keywords:
Punishment, Thieves, Syafi'i Madzhab, Az-Zahiri MadzhabAbstract
This research aims to find out the punishment for thieves according to the Syafi'i school of thought. And to find out the punishment for thieves according to az-Zahiri. And to know the differences and similarities between madzhab opinions. This research was carried out using library research and paying attention to the field (Field Research). Literature study is a process of searching for various literature, the results of studies related to the research to be carried out. The results of the research show that the punishment for thieves in the Syafi'i school of thought is cutting off their hands. If the thief has been charged by the law (mukallaf), not under duress, the thing stolen is not an item of doubt, and the theft did not occur during a war in the way of Allah. Likewise, stolen goods are taken secretly or secretly, the thing taken is property, the property belongs to/belongs to someone else, and the stolen property reaches the nisab. With a minimum limit on the price of the stolen goods, it is a quarter of a dinar, and simplified to Rp. 812,500,-. The similarity between the Shafi'i and az-Zahiri schools of thought is that the punishment for thieves is cutting off their hands. And the legal basis for theft is Surah al-Maidah verse 38. Meanwhile, the difference is in the nominal amount of the item stolen and the location of the item stolen. The Syafi'i Madzhab requires that the minimum price for stolen goods be a quarter of a dinar. If it is less than that then you will be subject to ta'jir. Meanwhile, az-Zahiri did not question the nisab of these goods because of the generality of the verse. And according to the as-Safi'i school of thought, the goods must be in a special place, while az-Zahiri does not have to place the goods in a prepared place.
References
Abdul Qadir Hauda. (n.d.). Al Fiqh Al Jina’I Al Islami. Dar al- Turas.
Abdullah Zakiy Al-Kaaf. (2000). Fiqih Tujuh Madzhab (1st ed., p. 344). Pustaka Setia.
al-Asqalani. (n.d.). Fath al-Bari. Maktabah Al-Iman.
Akhun Naf’an. (2007). Al-Qur’an Terjemah. Imajina Fun Studio.
Fuad Thohari. (2016). Hadits Ahkam Kajian Hadis-hadis Hukum Pidana Islam (Hudud,Qishash, dan Ta’zir). CV. Budi Utama.
Ibnu Hazm, Syaikh Ahmad Muhammad Syakir. Terjemah Al-Muhalla. Pustaka Azzam.
Imam Malik. (n.d.). Auza’al Masalik. Darul Fikir.
Imam Nasai. (1964). Sunan al Nasai. ustafa Babil Halabi.
Kadar M. Yusuf. (2011). Tafsir Ayat Ahkam. Sinar Grafika Offset.
Mardani. (2008). Sanksi Potong Tangan Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum.Metodologi Studi Tokoh Pemikiran Islam-copyright.pdf. (n.d.).
Muhammad al-Khatib. (2000). Mughni al-Muhtaj. Darul Fikir.
Muhammad bin Isma’il Al-Kahlani Al-Shan’ani. (2009). Subul Al-Salâm. Dahlan.
Muhammad Idris Asy Syafi’I. (1981). Al-Um. Al Faniyah Muttahidah.
Muhammad Nurul Irfan. (2013). Fiqih Jinayah. Amzah.
Muhammad Syamsul Haq Al-Azhim Abadi. (2001). ‘Aun Al-Ma’bûd Syarh Sunan Abî Dâwûd. Darl Hadits.
Muslim. (n.d.). Shahih Muslim. Maktabah Dahlan.
Sayyid Sabiq. (n.d.). Fikih Sunnah jilid 4.
Yahya bin syaraf An-Nawawi. (1985). Raudah Al-Tâlibîn wa ‘Umdah Al-Muftîn. Al-Maktab Al-Islami.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Hikmah Hasibuan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.