Polemik Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Yang Bertentangan Dengan Prinsip The Rule Of Law

Athar Tristan Andana Kanz; Reza Yuda Sakti; Romauli Yohana Sinaga; Serlin Lovina Manalu

doi:10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i2.304

Authors

Athar Tristan Andana Kanz Universitas Negeri Semarang
Reza Yuda Sakti Universitas Negeri Semarang
Romauli Yohana Sinaga Universitas Negeri Semarang
Serlin Lovina Manalu Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i2.304

Keywords:

Principle of the rule of law, UU ITE, Contrary

Abstract

Rule of Law is a basic principle in a legal system where the law applies equally to everyone, including the government and citizens, and no person or party is excluded from the law. It also emphasises that legal decisions must be based on existing laws and must be implemented fairly and consistently. The law is the highest norm that binds all other legal norms, thus becoming the foundation for state power and legal regulation within a country. The rule of law and the law are closely interrelated in a country's legal system. In a well-functioning legal system, the rule of law and the law work together to create justice and security for all citizens. The rule of law helps ensure that the government does not abuse its power or violate the rights of individuals. The purpose of this research is to analyse Law No. 11 of 2008 which has been amended into Law No. 19 of 2016 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) which is not in accordance with the principles of The Rule of Law and how this ITE Law can reflect the principles of The Rule of Law. This research method is library research. The results of this study are the development of technology and information today makes the government then issue Law Number 11 of 2008 (ITE Law) concerning the use of technology as well as information, ITE Law prohibits all forms of criminal acts that violate using technology and information, such as information disseminated will get bad treatment for the community. In practice in Indonesia, there are several cases that contradict the principle of The Rule of Law, for example, the ITE Law can cause confusion due to the increasing total every year of technology and information users, so the use of technological facilities is also increasingly widespread plus the ITE Law until now has not been widely socialised to the public.

References

Aditya, Z. F., & Winat (2018). Reconstruction Of The Hierarhycy Of Legislation In

Indonesia. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Kedailan dan Kesejataeraan, 89

Afif, Zida. “'Konsep Negara Hukum Dalam Sistem Kettanegaraan Indonesia.” Artikl Pionir LPMP Univerrsitas Asahan 72, 6 (2018): 55–60.

Aganag, Ilham. “Ilham Agang 1 Negara Hukum Yang Diadakan Oleh A . V . Dicey II . Dalam Gagsannya Rule of Law Sebagai Berikut : UndangBiasa Dan Keputusan Judisial , Bukan Perihal Apriori Dan Dibawa Bersama Dengan Kelahiran Atau Kedatangannya Di Dalam KehidupMohammad.” Pusham Unimed 7, no. 1 (2015): 116–35.

Aliskin, Zaenal, and Amiruddin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Asshiddiqie,Jimly. Pengantar Illmu HukumTataNegara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstusiti RI, 2006

Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Peradilan Etika dan EtikKonstitusi: PikiranBaru tentang Negara Hukum and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics (Edisi Revisi).

Sinar Grafika.

Fadli, Muhammad. “Pembenttiukan Undang-UndangYangMengikuti Perkembangan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Legalisai Indonesia , no. 11 (2018):50-54.

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory Of Law. Cetak ulan. California: University of California Press, 1969.

Lindsey, Simon Butt. “"Rule of Law Reform in Indonesia: Legal Pluralism, Power and Change.” Jurnal Indonesia and the Malay World, 2010.

Makkasau, E. S. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Pada Pasal 27 ayat 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informais dan Transaksi elektronik

Manullang, S. O. Adanya Kesadaran Manusia Dalam Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Thaun 2008 Perihal Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronok pada Media Sosial Dedication, 1(1), 54-64.

Miptahul, M. (2020). Analisa Tentang Hak Untuk Bebas Berpendapat pada Media Sosial Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Jurnal Sosall dan EConomi, (02)

Prasetyo, T. (2010). Rule of Law dalam Dimensi Adanya HukumIndonesia.

Ridi, Achmad. Bnetuk Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Setiaji, M. L. (2017). Kajian Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Negara the Rule of Law: Antara Hukum yang Progsresiffif dan Hukum Potifif. Lex Secientia Law Review,

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.

Susanti, Bivitri. “Rule of Law Key to Fostering Democracy in Indonesia,” 2020.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta, 2016

Venn Albert, Diceyy. Introdutionn to the Studi of the Law of the Costtitution. rd ed. Inggris.Pennsylvania State University: Maccmillan and Company, 2012.

Wahyu A, Winanrno. “Sebuah Analisis Pada Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Ekonomi_ Akuntansi 10, no. 1 (2012): 40-55.