Analisis Yuridis terhadap Sengketa Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Uji Materi terhadap Pasal 169 Huruf q Undang – Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v3i1.4368Keywords:
Verdict, MK, Presidential Candidates, Vice Presidential CandidatesAbstract
The Constitutional Court is a judicial institution in Indonesia which was established on August 13, 2003. The Constitutional Court has the authority regulated in article 24C of the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court which was later updated to Law Number 8 of 2011. The Constitutional Court has a principle in making a decision on the material test of the law against the Constitution, which applies to everyone, final, independent and impartial. The Constitutional Court's (MK) decision regarding the age limit for presidential and vice presidential candidates (presidential and vice presidential candidates) in Case Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 continues to reap pros and cons. In the decision, the Constitutional Court granted part of the application that tested Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This study aims to identify and analyze disputes over the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the material test of article 169 letter q of Law number 7 of 2017 concerning general elections in terms of juridical aspects. The research method used is a literature study of the Constitutional Court decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 with a focus on normative legal analysis. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court's decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is formally inconsistent with Law Number 49 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Constitutional Court Regulation No. 2/PMK/2021.
References
Avianti, K. D., & Pamungkas, Y. (2024). Analisis yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pengujian undang-undang (Studi putusan MK No. 29/PUU-XXI/2023, No. 55/PUU-XXI/2023, No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023). Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 6(3), 1325-1337.
Dokumen dan Berita Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2023). Rapat Permusyawaratan Hakim tentang Sengketa Pemilu. Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta.
Kelilauw, A. A., & Firmantoro, Z. A. (2024). Analisis legal standing dan konsistensi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam pengujian materiil UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi kasus putusan No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 4(2), 97-107.
Laporan KPU RI. (2023). Implementasi Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 dalam Pemilu 2024. Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Muhdar, Muhdar. (2023). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat. Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 123-145.
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PMK/2021 tentang Tata Cara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Peraturan MK No. 2/PMK/2021.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Pengujian Pasal 169 Huruf q Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
Subandri, R. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang persyaratan batas usia pencalonan presiden dan wakil presiden. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(1), 135-153.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 hasil perubahan ketiga.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
