Upaya Preventif Solusi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Teknologi Aproach Blockchain Open Ladger System : (Studi Kasus Anggota DPRD Kota Surabaya)

Ericha Putri; Lucky Dafira Nugroho

doi:10.59581/doktrin.v2i4.4132

Authors

Ericha Putri Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Lucky Dafira Nugroho Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i4.4132

Keywords:

Crime, Corruption, Member of Parliament, Blockchain, Surabaya City

Abstract

Corruption problems have occurred involving members of the Surabaya City DPRD, the defendant Syaiful Aidy, S.H. Setiawan offered a profit sharing of 10%-15% to the defendant Syaiful Aidy, S.H. The results of the corruption trial committed by the defendant Syaiful Aidy, S.H have been decided with the verdict number 131/Pid.Sus/TPK/2019/PN.SBY. Public concerns and declining trust in government financial management are caused by the many individuals involved in corrupt practices. The existence of the Blockchain Open Ledger System provides a solution for financial management that aims to reduce the number of corruption in Indonesia. In this research, the method used is a literature review that refers to previous studies listed in journals and articles. The results of this study show that the defendant has violated 4 elements (1) Every individual (2) which aims to benefit themselves, others, or a corporate entity (3) by abusing the authority, opportunity, or resources they have due to their position or position (4) can harm the state's finances or economy. A blockchain system can serve as a preventive measure in the management of the state's financial budget by providing clear transparency regarding the flow of funds. This allows the public to monitor the movement of the budget directly, so that in the event of irregularities or discrepancies, the perpetrators and problems can be identified.

References

April, N., & Arwani, A. (2024). Eksplorasi Peran Teknologi Blockchain dalam Meningkatkan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas dalam Keuangan Islam : Tinjauan Sistematis. 2(2), 23–37.

Azmi, I. F., & Aji, A. (2023). Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Anti-corruption system 4 . 0 : The adoption of blockchain technology in the public sector. 9(1), 93–108.

Doguchaeva, S., Zubkova, S., & Katrashova, Y. (2022). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Blockchain in public supply chain management : advantages and Blockchain in public supply chain management : advantages and risks risks. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 2172–2178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.244

Dulay, D., & Lee, S. (2024). Sorry Not Sorry: Presentational strategies and the electoral punishment of corruption. Electoral Studies, 92(September), 102867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102867

Gao, H., Zhong, B., & Ding, L. (2024). Automation in Construction A blockchain-based engineering design review service trading scheme for digital building permits. Automation in Construction, 165(March), 105496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105496

Gong, T., & Lau, C. H. (2024). Navigating anti-corruption strategies. Global Public Policy and Governance, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-024-00099-0

Gultom, M. F., Simanjuntak, L., Dewi, A. E., Widiyani, H., Raja, U. M., & Haji, A. (2024). Peran Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pencegahan korupsi (Studi Kasus Implementasi Sistem E-Govemment). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/XX..XXXXX/syariah

Mustafa, M., Norta, A., & Normak, P. (2024). Blockchain : Research and Applications Blockchain-based governance models supporting corruption-transparency : A systematic literature review. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5(2), 100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100186

Niken, ’, & Ginting, R. (2022). Analisis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama Oleh Anggota Dprd Kota Surabaya. Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 11(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v11i3.67457

Rivera, L. (2024). International Journal of Information Blockchain : An opportunity to improve supply chains in the wake of digitalization. 4(September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100290

Siburian, R. J., & Wijaya, D. (2022). Korupsi dan Birokrasi: Non-Conviction based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Yang Lebih Berdayaguna. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i1.12233

Silitonga, M. S., Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A. B., & Heyse, L. (2023). Democratizing corruption: a role structure analysis of Indonesia’s “Big Bang” decentralization. Applied Network Science, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-023-00535-w

Suyatmiko, W. H. (2021). Memaknai Turunnya Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Tahun 2020. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.717

Zhou, D., Konadu, V., & Alessa, N. (2024). The impact of corruption on climate risk – An international evidence. Environmental Development, 52, 101059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101059