Analisis Yuridis Surat Edaran Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Konsistensi Materi Muatan Surat Edaran Penanganan Covid-19

Authors

  • Ekwan Ahmad Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
  • Marwan Djafar Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
  • Rafika Nur Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
  • Rusmulyadi Rusmulyadi Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v1i4.1540

Keywords:

Analysis, Juridical, Circular, Letters

Abstract

The rapid response to COVID-19 by central and local governments relies on Circular Letters, convenient policy tools requiring no external approval. Despite their ease of use, Circular Letters often trigger debates and legal disputes due to inconsistencies in content and legal status.The research methodology employed is normative legal research, conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. The findings of the study reveal that the existence of Circular Letters, which is a form of policy regulation, results from the discretionary power vested in the government. However, as discussed above, there is a lack of consistency among officials regarding the format and content of Circular Letters, leading to some Circular Letters containing legal norms that are generally binding on the public. In contrast, according to the Regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 80 of 2012 and the Regulation of the Head of the National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014, Circular Letters are classified as administrative document products. Consequently, the implication of this research is that Circular Letters should only serve as internal communication tools, providing notifications within the internal organizational structure.

References

Azhary, T. (1992). Negara Hukum. Jakarta: bulan bintang.

Kusdarini, E. (2015). Dasar-dasar Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, . Yogyakarta: : UNY Press.

Nalle, V. I. (2009). Kewenangan Yudikatif Dalam Pengujian Peraturan kebijakan kajian putusan Mahkamah Agung No.23/P/HUM/2009. . Jurnal Yudisial.

Pace. (2022, 12). space. Diambil kembali dari https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/17012/05.2%20bab%2022

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. jakarta: kencana prenada.

PSHK. (2022, 12). https://pshk.or.id/rr/polemik-penerbitan-perppu-momen-revisi-uu- pembentukan-peraturan/ diakses pada tanggal 12 Desember 2022. Diambil kembali dari https://pshk.or.id/rr/polemik-penerbitan-perppu-momen-revisi-uu- pembentukan-peraturan/ diakses pada tanggal 12 Desember 2022: https://pshk.or.id/rr/polemik-penerbitan-perppu-momen-revisi-uu- pembentukan-peraturan/ diakses pada tanggal 12 Desember 2022

Shidarta. (2013). Pendekatan Hukum Progresif Dalam Mencairkan Kebekuan Produk Legislasi, dalam Dekonstruksi dan Gerakan Pemikiran Hukum Progresif. . jakarta: Thafa Media.

Sihotang, G. A. (2017). Diskresi dan tanggung jawab pejabat publik pada pelaksanaan tugas dalam situasi darurat. . Law Reform.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-25

How to Cite

Ekwan Ahmad, Marwan Djafar, Rafika Nur, & Rusmulyadi Rusmulyadi. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Surat Edaran Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Konsistensi Materi Muatan Surat Edaran Penanganan Covid-19. Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(4), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v1i4.1540

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.