Faktor Penyebab dan Upaya Penanggulangan Kasus Pembunuhan di Kelurahan Danga, Kecamatan Aesesa, Kabupaten Nagekeo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1689Keywords:
Factors Causing Murder, Countermeasures, MurderAbstract
The purpose of this research is to analyse the causal factors and efforts to overcome murder cases in Danga Village, Aesesa District, Nagekeo Regency. This type of research is empirical juridical, the approach that the author uses in this research is a qualitative approach. The location of this research is the Nagekeo Resort Police Office. The subjects used as researchers in this study are police officers. The data collection techniques used in this study are interviews, documentation. This research uses a type of qualitative research that produces descriptive data. The results of this study are the criminal act of premeditated murder in the case occurred due to several causative factors, such as unstable emotions, alcoholic beverages, economic factors, low levels of education, revenge factors. The existence of the application of the death penalty Article 340 of the Criminal Code against the perpetrators of the criminal act of premeditated murder which has a very serious capacity and is carried out cruelly, sadistically and truly violates the highest values of humanity. The countermeasures taken against the disclosure of murder cases are Preemtif efforts, namely socialisation, to prevent more severe crimes, the security forces conduct socialisation to the people throughout Indonesia. Furthermore, Repressive efforts are crime scene processing, the authenticity of the place that occurred at the scene of the crime. Finally, the Preventive effort is that the security forces stop the perpetrator's actions so that his behaviour is not repeated again so as not to harm many people or himself.
References
Abidin, Zainal.(2008). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.
Alwi Hidayat, M., Muhadar, M., & Muchtar, S. (2020). Analisis Kriminologis Atas Pembunuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi Kasus Di Makassar Tahun 2017-2019). Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v7i1.14893
Andi Hamzah. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Arief, B.N. (2011). Bunga Rampai kebijakan Hukum Pidana.Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
Chazawi,Adami.(2010). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Prasada.
Djamali, Abdoel (2013). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta.
Evi Hartanti, 2005, Tindak Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Lamintang Theo, dan Lamintang P.A.F. (2010). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.
Musakkir. (2013). Putusan Hakim Yang Diskriminatif Dalam Perkara Pidana Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Dan Psikologi Hukum, Cet I: Yogyakarta: Mahakarya Rangkang Offset
Moeljatno, 2008, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Prodjodikoro,W. (2012). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.
Simbolon, V. E. B., Simarmata, M., & Rahmayanti, R. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Menggunakan Besi Padat di Medan Tinjauan Kasus Nomor 2305/Pid.B/2017/Pn.Mdn. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 12(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2352
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo, 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Sudarsono, Bambang. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sudrajat, M.Bassa. (2009). Tindakan-tindakan Pidana tertentu Dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT remaja Karya
Winartha, I Made. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
http:/www.memo arema.com/kasus pembunuhaan yang banyak belum terungkap diakses pada 7 April 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.